Impact of ChatGPT on critical thinking in 10th grade social Studies Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51247/pdlc.v7i1.691Keywords:
critical thinking, artificial intelligence, Sciences sociales, ChatGPTAbstract
This study investigated the impact of AI on the development of critical thinking among 10th-grade students of Upper Basic General Education in the area of Social Sciences at the Juan Montalvo Educational Unit. The research, with a mixed approach and a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design, involved a purposive sample of 25 students and two Social Sciences teachers. Regarding the post-test results, a significant increase in students' critical thinking skills was revealed; it was highlighted that the interviews with teachers supported these findings, mentioning the effectiveness of ChatGPT as a tool for research and debate. In conclusion, the study demonstrated the positive impact of implementing a ChatGPT-centered activity system on the development of critical thinking in the specific context of upper basic education in Social Sciences.
Downloads
References
Alharbi, W. (2023). AI in the Foreign Language Classroom: A Pedagogical Overview of Automated Writing Assistance Tools. Education Research International, 2023, 4253331. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4253331
Álvarez, H. (2024). La Inteligencia Artificial como Catalizador en la Enseñanza de la Historia: Retos y Posibilidades Pedagógicas. Revista Tecnológica-Educativa Docentes 2.0, 16(2), 318-325. https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v16i2.426
Atencio, R., Bonilla, D., Miles, M., & López, S. (2023). Chat GPT como Recurso para el Aprendizaje del Pensamiento Crítico en Estudiantes Universitarios. CIENCIAMATRIA, 9(17), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.35381/cm.v9i17.1121
Ayuso, D., & Gutiérrez, P. (2022). La Inteligencia Artificial como recurso educativo durante la formación inicial del profesorado. RIADO. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 25(2), 347-362. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.25.2.32332
Balderas, A., Cruz, C., Zapata, N., & Salazar, J. (2022). La validación por juicio de expertos como estrategia para medir la confiabilidad de un instrumento. Revista de divulgación científica y tecnológica, 8(1), 9-18. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9593530
Barton, H., Vlachopoulos, D., Essuman, A., & Opuni, J. (2024). ChatGPT effects on cognitive skills of undergraduate students: Receiving instant responses from AI-based conversational large language models (LLMs). Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100198
Benavides, C., & Ruiz, A. (2022). El pensamiento crítico en el ámbito educativo: una revisión sistemática. Revista Innova Educación, 4(2), 62-79. https://doi.org/10.35622/j.rie.2022.02.004
Bhullar, P., Joshi, M., & Chugh, R. (2024). ChatGPT in higher education - a synthesis of the literature and a future research agenda. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 21501–21522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12723-x
Bolaño, M., & Duarte, N. (2024). Una revisión sistemática del uso de la inteligencia artificial en la educación. Revista Colombiana de Cirugía, 39(1), 51-63. https://doi.org/10.30944/20117582.2365
Calle, G. (2013). La evaluación de las habilidades del pensamiento crítico asociadas a la escritura digital. Revista Virtual Universidad Católica del Norte(40), 68-83. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/1942/194229200005.pdf
Crawford, J., Cowling, M., & Allen, K. (2023). Leadership is needed for ethical ChatGPT: Character, assessment, and learning using artificial intelligence (AI). Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.3.02
Flotts, P., Manzi, J., Jiménez, D., Abarzúa, A., Cayuman, C., & García, M. (2015). Informe de resultados TERCE: logros de aprendizaje. Unesco. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000243532
García, I., González, C., Ramírez, M., & Molina, J. (2025). Challenges of implementing ChatGPT on education: Systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 8, 100401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100401
Hasanein, A., & Sobaih, A. (2023). Drivers and Consequences of ChatGPT Use in Higher Education: Key Stakeholder Perspectives. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(11), 2599-2614. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13110181
Herrera, J., Calero, J., González, M., Collazo, M., & Travieso, Y. (2022). El método de consulta a expertos en tres niveles de validación. Revista Habanera de Ciencias Médicas, 21(1). https://revhabanera.sld.cu/index.php/rhab/article/view/4711
Ilaquiche, R., Laverde, E., Tapia, A., & Zumba, A. (2025). Revolucionando el pensamiento crítico: estrategias didácticas innovadoras para estudiantes mediante la integración de inteligencia artificial. Polo del Conocimiento, 10(1), 1530-1550. https://polodelconocimiento.com/ojs/index.php/es/article/view/8768/html
Ilieva, G., Yankova, T., Klisarova, S., Dimitrov, A., Bratkov, M., & Angelov, D. (2023). Effects of Generative Chatbots in Higher Education. Information, 14(9), 492. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14090492
Instituto Nacional de Evaluación Educativa. (2018). Educación en Ecuador: Resultados de PISA para el Desarrollo. http://evaluaciones.evaluacion.gob.ec/BI/nacionales-informes-y-resultados/
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Kuchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., . . . Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Liu, M., Zhang, L., & Biebricher, C. (2024). Investigating students’ cognitive processes in generative AI-assisted digital multimodal composing and traditional writing. Computers & Education, 211, 104977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104977
Lo, C., Hew, K., & Jong, M. (2024). The influence of ChatGPT on student engagement: A systematic review and future research agenda. Computers & Education, 219, 105100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105100
López, M., Moreno, E., Uyaguari, J., & Barrera, M. (2022). El desarrollo del pensamiento crítico en el aula: Testimonios de docentes ecuatorianos de excelencia. Areté, Revista Digital del Doctorado en Educación, 8(15), 161-180. https://doi.org/10.55560/arete.2022.15.8.8
Luckin, R., George, K., & Cukurova, M. (2022). AI for School Teachers. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003193173
Malpica, F. (2 de Mayo de 2023). La Educación en la era de la Inteligencia Artificial: claves del aprendizaje con la IA. Educaccion. Revista EDUCACCIÓN. https://institutoeducaccion.org/la-educacion-en-la-era-de-la-inteligencia-artificial-claves-del-aprendizaje-con-la-ia/
Michel, R., Vilalta, E., Salinas, D., Thierry, R., & Silvestre, F. (2023). Challenges and Opportunities of Generative AI for Higher Education as Explained by ChatGPT. Education Sciences, 13(9), 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090856
Ministerio de Educación. (18 de Septiembre de 2023). Orientaciones para el uso pedagógico de herramientas de Inteligencia Artificial en el proceso de enseñanza aprendizaje que garanticen el uso efectivo y ético en el aula. https://recursos.educacion.gob.ec/red/orientaciones-para-el-uso-pedagogico-de-herramientas-de-inteligencia-artificial-en-el-proceso-de-ensenanza-aprendizaje-que-garanticen-el-uso-efectivo-y-etico-en-el-aula/
Moreno, R. (2019). La llegada de la inteligencia artificial a la educación. RITI Journal, 7(14), 260–270. https://doi.org/10.36825/RITI.07.14.022
Olite, D., Morales, I., & Vidal, M. (2023). Chat GPT: origen, evolución, retos e impactos en la educación. Educación Médica Superior, 37(2). https://ems.sld.cu/index.php/ems/article/view/3876
Parra, J. (2022). Potencialidades de la Inteligencia Artificial en Educación Superior: Un Enfoque desde la Personalización. Revista Docentes 2.0, 14(1), 19-27. https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v14i1.296
Parreño, J., Rivera, D., Uvidia, M., & Jara, J. (2024). La Inteligencia Artificial: herramienta para el desarrollo del pensamiento crítico en estudiantes de instituciones educativas. Revista Conrado, 20(96), 478–485. https://conrado.ucf.edu.cu/index.php/conrado/article/view/3605
Puente, M., Torres, J., Blanco, A., Hernández, Y., & Marquez, J. (2024). Investigating the use of chatGPT as a tool for enhancing critical thinking and argumentation skills in international relations debates among undergraduate students. Smart Learning Environments, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00347-0
Sevilla, T., & Barrios, M. (2024). Actitudes de los estudiantes de educación básica hacia la inteligencia artificial: Una adaptación. Revista INVECOM, 4(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10612162
Supangat, & Mohd , B. (2020). Development of E-learning System Using Felder and Silverman’s Index of Learning Styles Model. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 9(5), 8554–8561. https://doi.org/10.30534/ijatcse/2020/236952020
Suriano, R., Plebe, A., Acciai, A., & Fabio, R. (2025). Student interaction with ChatGPT can promote complex critical thinking skills. Learning and Instruction, 95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102011
Tarchi, C., Zappoli, A., Ledesma, L., & Wennas, E. (2024). The Use of ChatGPT in Source-Based Writing Tasks. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00413-1
Universidad de Stanford. (20 de Diciembre de 2022). Stanford faculty weigh in on ChatGPT's shake-up in education. https://ed.stanford.edu/news/stanford-faculty-weigh-new-ai-chatbot-s-shake-learning-and-teaching
Wang, C. (2024). Exploring Students’ Generative AI-Assisted Writing Processes: Perceptions and Experiences from Native and Nonnative English Speakers. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09744-3
Wang, H., Dang, A., Wu, Z., & Mac, H. (2024). Generative AI in higher education: Seeing ChatGPT through universities' policies, resources, and guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100326
Yan, D. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 13943–13967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4
Yeo, N., & Tang, B. (2024). Letter to editor: NLP systems such as ChatGPT cannot be listed as an author because these cannot fulfill widely adopted authorship criteria. Accountability in Research, 31(7), 968–970. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2177160
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jhon Alex Mejia-Mendoza, Dunia Mileidy Cuenca-Lojan, Jordy Abel Correa-Burgos, Jesús Israel Vera-Moncerrate
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
