Os impactos dos jogos dêiticos como preditores da aprendizagem entre pares na construção do vocabulário em língua inglesa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51247/p18ys271Palavras-chave:
Jogo de controle ótimo, interface humana, estratégias instrucionaisResumo
Esta pesquisa tem como objetivo examinar o impacto de um jogo dêitico como preditor da construção do vocabulário em língua inglesa dos estudantes. Participaram do estudo um total de 120 estudantes do primeiro ano do ensino secundário (J.S.S.I) e três professores, provenientes do Distrito Educacional III de Lagos Island. Os participantes foram distribuídos em um grupo experimental e um grupo de controle. Antes da intervenção, todos os participantes realizaram um teste diagnóstico (pré-teste) e, posteriormente, foram submetidos a atividades de construção do vocabulário em língua inglesa, por meio de exercícios de ensino desenvolvidos durante quatro semanas. O grupo experimental foi submetido ao protocolo de tratamento, seguido de um pós-teste aplicado a ambos os grupos. A pesquisa empregou uma abordagem de métodos mistos, combinando dados quantitativos provenientes da ecologia da sala de aula com dados qualitativos obtidos por meio de entrevistas. Foi realizada uma análise de covariância para identificar diferenças na capacidade de construção do vocabulário em língua inglesa. Os resultados demonstraram uma diferença significativa no desempenho entre os grupos experimental e de controle. Isso implica que a aprendizagem entre pares e os jogos dêiticos influenciaram significativamente a construção do vocabulário. Além disso, o gênero não apresentou efeito significativo sobre a aprendizagem entre pares e as atividades lúdicas desenvolvidas no estudo. O desempenho dos participantes pode ser atribuído tanto às capacidades individuais quanto aos esforços coletivos. Os resultados mostraram que α = 0,05, gl = 119 e R = 0,784. A manifestação da aprendizagem entre pares e dos jogos dêiticos demonstrou que, com α = 0,05 e gl = 118, o valor observado foi tobs = 6,84 > 1,96. Esses resultados estabeleceram uma relação entre a aprendizagem entre pares e os jogos dêiticos
Downloads
Referências
Almusharraf, N., Aljasser, M., Dalbani, H., & Alsheikh, D. (2023). Gender differences in utilizing a game-based approach within the EFL online classrooms. Heliyon, 9(2), e13136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13136
Ansari, R., Abdul Jaffar, B., Riaz, S., Kaur, M. J., & Mushtaq, A. (2019). Datamining to alert the formation of women objectification stereotypes in video games. In 2019 Amity International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AICAI) (pp. 521–526). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/AICAI.2019.8701256
Ayeni, A. J., & Afolabi, E.R.I. (2012). Teachers’ instructional task performance and quality assurance of students’ learning outcomes in Nigerian secondary schools. International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrset.2012.v1i1.47
Ayinde, O. M. (2002). Computer-based instruction in primary schools: A case for mathematics and English. Educational Perspective: A Journal of the Faculty of Education, Lagos State University, 5(2), 28-32.
Ayinde, O. M. (2017). Structured Instructional Process and performance of Junior Secondary School 2 students in Mathematics. Journal Pendidikan Malaysia, 42(2), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.17576/jpen-2017-42.02-07
Billen, A. (1993). Could it be the end for supermario? The observer 27th June.
Black, R. (2007). Crossing the bridge: Overcoming entrenched disadvantage through student-centred learning. Education Foundation Australia. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED501899
Boud, D. (2001). Making the move to peer learning. In Boud, D., Cohen, R. &Sampson, J. (Eds.) (2001). Peer Learning in Higher Education: Learning from and with each other. London: Kogan Page (now Routledge), 1-20.
Calvo-Morata, A., & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2023). Serious games for social problems. In Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 98–109). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33023-0_9
Cameron, B., & Dwyer, F. (2005). The Effect of Online Gaming, Cognition and Feedback Type in Facilitating Delayed Achievement of Different Learning Objectives. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16(3), 243–258.
Charles, D., & McAlister, M. (2004). Integrating Ideas About Invisible Playgrounds from Play Theory into Online Educational Digital Games. In Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 598–601). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28643-1_79
Cheung, S. Y., & Ng, K. Y. (2021). Application of the educational game to enhance student learning. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.623793
Christou, C., Jones, K., Mousoulides, N. and Pittalis, M. (2006). Developing the 3DMath Dynamic Geometry Software: theoretical perspectives on design, International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 13(4), 168-174.
Coleman, T. E., & Money, A. G. (2019). Student-centred digital game–based learning: a conceptual framework and survey of the state of the art. Higher Education, 79(3), 415–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00417-0
Connelly, M. F. (1993). Teacher Evaluation. A oritical review and a plea for supervised reflective practice. In Farrell. J and J. Oliveria (Eds). Teacher in Developing countries. Washington, D.C.
Drijvers, P. & Trouche, L. (2008). From artifacts to instruments: A theoretical framework behind orchestra metaphor. In M. K. Heid & G. W. Blume (Eds.) Research on Technology and the Teaching and Learning of mathematics: Research Syntheses, 1, 155-206. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Eisen, M. J. (1999). Peer learning partnerships: A qualitative case study of teaching partners professional development efforts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, teachers college, Columbia university, USA.
Fox, J., Ralston, R. A., Cooper, C. K., & Jones, K. A. (2014). Sexualized avatars lead to women’s Self-Objectification and acceptance of rape myths. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39(3), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684314553578
Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, Motivation, and Learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878102238607
Gogus, A. (2012). Peer Learning and Assessment. In: Seel, N.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_146
Goos, M., Soury-Lavergne, S., Assude, T., Brown, J., Kong, C., Glover, D., Grugeon, B., Larbode, C., Lavicza, Z., Miller, D. & Sinclair, M. (2010). Teachers and teaching: Theoretical perspectives and issues concerning classroom implementation. In C. Hoyle & J.B. Lagrange (Eds.) Mathematics Education and Technology-Rethinking the terrain, 311-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0146-0_14
Guin, D., & Trouche, L. (1998). The Complex Process of Converting Tools into Mathematical Instruments: The Case of Calculators. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 3(3), 195–227. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009892720043
Homayouni, M. (2022). Peer assessment in group-oriented classroom contexts: on the effectiveness of peer assessment coupled with scaffolding and group work on speaking skills and vocabulary learning. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00211-3
Hoyles, C. & Noss, R. (2003). ‘What can digital technologies take from and bring to research in mathematical education?’ In A. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & F.K.S. Leung (eds.). Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education, 323-349. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0273-8_11
Jääskä, E., & Aaltonen, K. (2022). Teachers’ experiences of using game-based learning methods in project management higher education. Project Leadership and Society, 3, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2022.100041
Ke, F., & Grabowski, B. (2006). Gameplaying for maths learning: cooperative or not? British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00593.x
Keerthirathne, W. K. D. (2020). Peer learning: an overview. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Science, 4(11), 1-6. Retrieved from https://ijses.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/151-IJSES-V4N10.pdf
Kerlinger, F. N & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of Behavioural Research. Published by Nelson Thomson Learning, 1120, Birchmount Road Toronto, OnitarioMik 5G4 Canada.
Kindermann, T. A. (1993). Natural peer groups as contexts for individual development: The case of children's motivation in school. Developmental Psychology, 29, 970-977. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.29.6.970
Kinzie, M. B., & Joseph, D. R. D. (2008). Gender differences in game activity preferences of middle school children: implications for educational game design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(5–6), 643–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9076-z
Laborde, C., Kynigos, C., Hollebrands, K., & Strasser, R. (2006). Teaching and Learning geometry with technology. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boera (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: past, present and future (pp. 275-304). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: sense Publishers.
Li, Y., Chen, D., & Deng, X. (2024). The impact of digital educational games on student’s motivation for learning: The mediating effect of learning engagement and the moderating effect of the digital environment. PLoS ONE, 19(1), e0294350. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294350
Lim, C. P., Nonis, D., & Hedberg, J. (2006). Gaming in a 3D multiuser virtual environment: engaging students in Science lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00531.x
Lu, H. (2012). Rethinking Game-based Learning from a Gender Perspective: A Case Study of a Male English Language Learner in China. Gender Technology and Development, 16(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/097185241101600103
Lukosch, H., Kurapati, S., Groen, D., & Verbraeck, A. (2017). Gender and cultural differences in game-based learning experiences. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 15(4), 310-319. Retrieved from https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejel/article/view/1840
Mitchell, A., & Savill-Smith, C. (2004). The use of computer and video games for learning: A Review of the Literature. Learning and skills development agency. Retrieved from http://www.lsda.org.uk/files/PDF/1529.pdf
Moreno, R. (2002). Who Learns Best with Multiple Representations? Cognitive Theory Predictions on Individual Differences in Multimedia Learning. 2002(1), 1380–1385. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/10238/
Murshidi, G. A., Wahyudi, A. B., Islam, M. M., Karthiga, S. V., & Rahmatika, L. (2024). Exploring United Arab Emirates school teachers’ perceptions, motivation and benefits of Game-Based teaching and learning environments. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 70(2), 310–327. https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/ajer.v70i2.78197
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Quinn, C N (1997) Engaging Learning. Instructional Technology Forum. Retrieved from http://itech1.coe.uga/itforum/paper18/paper18.html
Randel, J. M., Morris, B. A., Wetzel, C. D., & Whitehill, B. V. (1992). The Effectiveness of games for Educational Purposes: A review of recent research. Simulation & Gaming, 23(3), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878192233001
Saraswathi M.R., Saranya R., Neeraja U., Senthil S.K. (2023). Best peer active learning strategies for problem solving using C programming. Journal of Engineering Education/Journal of Engineering Education Transformations/Journal of Engineering Education Transformation, 36(4), 140-149. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2023/v36i4/23124
Singh, R., & Sarkar, S. (2015). Does teaching quality matter? Students learning outcome related to teaching quality in public and private primary schools in India. International Journal of Educational Development, 41, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.02.009
Verillon, P., & Rabardel, P. (1995). Cognition and artifacts: A contribution to the study of though in relation to instrumented activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10(1), 77–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03172796
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Front Matter. In M. Cole, V. Jolm-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes (pp. i–viii). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4.1
Zeng, J., & Shang, J. (2018). A review of empirical studies on educational games: 2013-2017. In ICCE 2018 - 26th International Conference on Computers in Education, main conference proceedings (pp. 533-542). Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education. Retrieved from https://library.apsce.net/index.php/ICCE/article/view/3706
Zhang, W. (2025). Investigating the Role of Instructional Strategies in Shaping College English Learning Outcomes under the Triangular OffConorm from a Practical Perspective. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15238808
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2026 Mukaila Ayinde Olatoye, Ahmed Orilonise Salami, Muideen Akintunde Ademola, Obiabuchi Martin Nnanna, Chikodili Odirachukwumma Anosike
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0.
