Enhancing security awareness in educational media: A perspective from quantitative, qualitative, and integrative theoretical approaches.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51247/pdlc.v6i2.734Keywords:
Security awareness, educational media, media theories, communication and societyAbstract
Security awareness has become a fundamental element for maintaining social stability and promoting responsible interaction within contemporary societies. In this context, educational media plays a significant role in disseminating values, knowledge, and ethical principles that contribute to the development of responsible and informed citizens. The present study aims to analyze the theoretical foundations that support the enhancement of security awareness within the field of educational media through the integration of quantitative, qualitative, and integrative approaches. The research adopts a theoretical and analytical perspective that examines the main academic contributions related to media influence, audience interaction, and the role of communication systems in shaping public awareness. From the quantitative perspective, the study reviews theories associated with behavioral influences, media dependency, and the diffusion of innovations, which explain the measurable effects of media messages on audiences. The qualitative perspective focuses on interpretative approaches, including cultural analysis and social responsibility theory, highlighting the ethical and societal responsibilities of media institutions. Additionally, the integrative approach combines multiple theoretical perspectives to provide a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between educational media and the development of security awareness. The findings suggest that educational media contributes significantly to strengthening social values such as citizenship, responsibility, and collective security when communication strategies are designed with educational objectives and ethical standards. Consequently, the integration of diverse theoretical approaches allows for a broader understanding of how media messages can effectively promote security awareness in contemporary societies.
Downloads
References
Anstead, N. (2014). The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics by W. Lance Bennett and Alexandra Segerberg. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(3), 345–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.923713
Ball-Rokeach, S. J., & DeFleur, M. L. (1976). A dependency model of mass-media effects. Communication research, 3(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027600300101
Bang, H., & Halupka, M. (2019). Contentious connective action: a new kind of life-political association for problematizing how expert systems operate. Information, Communication & Society, 22(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1355402
Bennett, W. L. (2014). Response to Sidney Tarrow’s review of the logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Perspectives on Politics, 12(2), 470-471.
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2023). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. In Handbook of digital politics (pp. 287-338). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Beyens, I. (2013). A Handbook of Media and Communication Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methodologies. Communications: the European Journal of Communication Research, 38(4), 445-449.
Bruns, A. (2015). Making sense of society through social media. Social media+ society, 1(1), 2056305115578679.
Bryant, J., & Zillmann, D. (1994). Media effects: Advances in theory AND Research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. New Yersey.
Cao, H. (2016). W. Lance Bennett & Alexandra Segerberg, The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. International Journal of Communication, 10, 5-5. file:///C:/Users/R.%20Espinoza/Downloads/ojsadmin,+5632-19605-5-ED.pdf
Castells, M. (2011). The rise of the network society. John wiley & sons.
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2018). The mediated construction of reality. John Wiley & Sons.
Deuze, M. (2011). Media life. Media, culture & society, 33(1), 137-148.
Elihu Katz, E., Jay Blumler, J. G., & Michael Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In J. G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19–32). Sage.
Espinoza Freire, E. E. (2020). La búsqueda de información científica en las bases de datos académicas. Revista Metropolitana de Ciencias Aplicadas, 3(1), 31-35.
Espinoza Freire, E. E. (2020). La investigación cualitativa, una herramienta ética en el ámbito pedagógico. Conrado, 16(75), 103-110.
Espinoza-Freire, E. E. (2022). Ética en la investigación científica. Revista Mexicana de Investigación e Intervención Educativa, 1(2), 35-43.
Espinoza-Freire, E. E. (2025). Estrategias de búsqueda de información en bases de datos científicas: Una guía práctica. Sociedad & Tecnología, 8(S2), 647-658.
Espinoza-Freire, E. E. (2025). PRISMA en la práctica: Guía y desafíos en la conducción de revisiones sistemáticas. Sociedad & Tecnología, 8(S2), 623-646.
Fuchs, C. (2017). Social media: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1994). Growing up with television: The cultivation perspective. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 17–41). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Jenkins, H., & Deuze, M. (2008). Convergence culture. Convergence, 14(1), 5-12.
Jensen, K. B. (Ed.). (2002). A handbook of media and communication research (pp. 254-272). London: routledge.
King, B. G. (2014). The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. American Journal of Sociology Vol. 120, No. 3 (November 2014), pp. 968-971
Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. The communication of ideas, 37(1), 136-139.
Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1968). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. Columbia University Press.
Lerner, D. (1958). The passing of traditional society: Modernizing the Middle East. Free Press.
Livingstone, S. (2019). Audiences in an age of datafication: Critical questions for media research. Television & new media, 20(2), 170-183.
Mattoni, A. (2015). Book review: The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Media, Culture & Society, 37(6), 948-951. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437155945.
McCluskey, M. (2014). The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics, by W. Lance Bennett and Alexandra Segerberg. Political Communication, 31(4), 677–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2014.956034
McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail’s mass communication theory (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.
Rainie, H., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system (Vol. 10). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2014). Diffusion of innovations. In An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 432-448). Routledge.
Scheidt, L. A. (2015). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Media & Society, 17(2), 314-316. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448145543
Shirky, C. (2009). Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations: [with an updated epilogue]. New York; Toronto; London: Penguin books.
Theocharis, Y. (2016). The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics By W. Lance Bennett and Alexandra Segerberg Cambridge University Press. 2013. 251 pages.
Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming conversation: The power of talk in a digital age. Penguin.
Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Said Farek, Braktia Souad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
