Uma visão geral da robótica médica e suas contribuições
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51247/st.v8iS1.559Resumo
A robótica evoluiu rapidamente em vários campos, incluindo indústria, aeroespacial, militar, educação, entretenimento e saúde, entre outros, com o objetivo de auxiliar humanos. Quando a robótica é usada na área da saúde, ela é chamada de "Robótica Médica" e busca dar suporte a procedimentos cirúrgicos, telemedicina, reabilitação ou atendimento ao paciente com o objetivo de melhorar a qualidade de vida das pessoas. Este artigo lista algumas contribuições da robótica médica desenvolvidas nos últimos 15 anos. É descrita uma classificação dos robôs médicos em função da sua finalidade, considerando os robôs cirúrgicos, aqueles para tarefas de reabilitação, assistência ou manipulação, passando pelos microrrobôs e chegando aos robôs macios. Entre as aplicações, estão consideradas cirurgias minimamente invasivas (CMI) e outras que envolvem áreas como realidade virtual (RV), sistemas hápticos (SH) e inteligência artificial (IA). Este artigo fornece uma visão geral das aplicações atuais da robótica
Downloads
Referências
Asimov, I. (1942). Runaround.
Barrientos, A. (2014). Nuevas aplicaciones de la robótica. Robots de servicio.
Beasley, R. A. (2012). Medical Robots: Current Systems and Research Directions. Journal of Robotics, 2012, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/401613
Bensalem, S., Gallien, M., Ingrand, F., Kahloul, I., & Thanh-Hung, N. (2009). Designing autonomous robots. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 16(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2008.931631
Camacho-Ramirez, A., Ávila-Vilchis, J. C., Saldivar, B., Vilchis-González, A. H., & Jacinto-Villegas, J. M. (2022). Adjustable Stiffness-Based Supination–Pronation Forearm Physical Rehabilitator. Applied Sciences, 12(12), 6164. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12126164
Chavez Cardona M, Rodríguez Spitia, Felipe, & Baradica López, Asfur. (2010). Repository.eia.edu.co › entities › publicationExoesqueletos para potenciar las capacidades humanas y apoyar la rehabilitación. Revista Ingeniería Biomédic, 4(7), 63–73.
Cianchetti, M., Laschi, C., Menciassi, A., & Dario, P. (2018). Biomedical applications of soft robotics. Nature Reviews Materials, 3(6), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-018-0022-y
Cifuentes, M, & Luis A. (2002). Ortesis y Prótesis.
Cruz, Angel. (2007). Diseño de un robot de tres grados de libertad para punción, compatible con ambientes de tomografía computada y resonancia magnética, y fabricación de un primer prototipo de laboratorio [Thesis]. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México.
Cruz Martínez, G. M., & Z.-Avilés, L. A. (2020). Design Methodology for Rehabilitation Robots: Application in an Exoskeleton for Upper Limb Rehabilitation. Applied Sciences, 10(16), 5459. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10165459
Dario P, Eugenio Guglielmelli, Benedetto Allota, & Maria Chiara Carrozza. (1996). Robotics for medical applications. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 44–56.
Dario, P., (Guglielmelli), (Eugenio) (Allotta), (Benedetto). (1994). Robotics in medicine. In Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS’94), 2, 739–752.
Dávila-Vilchis, J.-M., Ávila-Vilchis, J. C., Vilchis-González, A. H., Zúñiga-Avilés, L. A., & Jacinto-Villegas, J. M. (2022). Fabric Inflatable Soft Actuators for Soft Wearable Devices: The MOSAR Case. Machines, 10(10), 871. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10100871
Dávila-Vilchis, J.-M., LAZ-Avilés, Ávila Vilchis, J. C., & Vilchis-González, A. H. (2019). Design Methodology for Soft Wearable Devices—The MOSAR Case. Applied Sciences, 9(22), 4727. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9224727
Dávila-Vilchis, J.-M., Morales, G. L. L., González, A. H. V., & Omonte, D.-. (2024). El Arte de los Origamis como Actuadores en la Robótica Suave. 3.
Diario Oficial de la Federación. (2021). NOM-241-SSA1-2021 [Online post]. https://sidofqa.segob.gob.mx/notas/5638793
Díaz, I., Gill, Juan, & Sanchéz, E. (2011). Lower-Limb Robotic Rehabilitation: Literature Review and Challenges. Jopurnal of Robotics, 1–11.
Domínguez-Ruiz, A., López-Caudana, E. O., Lugo-González, E., Espinosa-García, F. J., Ambrocio-Delgado, R., García, U. D., López-Gutiérrez, R., Alfaro-Ponce, M., & Ponce, P. (2023). Low limb prostheses and complex human prosthetic interaction: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 10, 1032748. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2023.1032748
Elendu, C., Amaechi, D. C., Elendu, T. C., Jingwa, K. A., Okoye, O. K., John Okah, M., Ladele, J. A., Farah, A. H., & Alimi, H. A. (2023). Ethical implications of AI and robotics in healthcare: A review. Medicine, 102(50), e36671. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000036671
European, U. (2024, September 7). EUR-Lex [Online post]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32017R0745
FDA, U. S. F. & D. (2024, August 30). CFR - Code of Federal Regulations Title 21 [Online post]. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?CFRPart=820
Fiorillo, L., D’Amico, C., Turkina, A. Y., Nicita, F., Amoroso, G., & Risitano, G. (2020). Endo and Exoskeleton: New Technologies on Composite Materials. Prosthesis, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis2010001
Hockstein, N. G., Gourin, C. G., Faust, R. A., & Terris, D. J. (2007). A history of robots: From science fiction to surgical robotics. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 1(2), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-007-0021-2
Housley, S. N., Fitzgerald, K., & Butler, A. J. (2018). Telerehabilitation Robotics: Overview of approaches and clinical outcomes. In Rehabilitation Robotics (pp. 333–346). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811995-2.00026-6
ISO. (2016). ISO 13485:2016 [Standard]. https://www.iso.org/standard/59752.html
Lee, J. G., Raj, R. R., Day, N. B., & Shields, C. W. (2023). Microrobots for Biomedicine: Unsolved Challenges and Opportunities for Translation. ACS Nano, 17(15), 14196–14204. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c03723
Li, F., Chen, J., Ye, G., Dong, S., Gao, Z., & Zhou, Y. (2023). Soft Robotic Glove with Sensing and Force Feedback for Rehabilitation in Virtual Reality. Biomimetics, 8(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8010083
Miriyev, A., Stack, K., & Lipson, H. (2017). Soft material for soft actuators. Nature Communications, 8(1), 596. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00685-3
Onliine Browsing Platform. (2021). Robotics [Online post]. ISO. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/en/#iso:std:iso:8373:ed-3:v1:en
Palmer, A., & Schwan, D. (2024). More Process, Less Principles: The Ethics of Deploying AI and Robotics in Medicine. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 33(1), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180123000087
Palomares Orihuela, R. J. (2016). Robot Da Vinci: El quirófano del futuro. Perfiles de Ingeniería, 2(11). https://doi.org/10.31381/perfiles_ingenieria.v2i11.430
Resquín, F., Cuesta Gómez, A., Gonzalez-Vargas, J., Brunetti, F., Torricelli, D., Molina Rueda, F., Cano De La Cuerda, R., Miangolarra, J. C., & Pons, J. L. (2016). Hybrid robotic systems for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: A review. Medical Engineering & Physics, 38(11), 1279–1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.09.001
Ríos-Hernández, M., Jacinto-Villegas, J. M., Portillo-Rodríguez, O., & Vilchis-González, A. H. (2021). User-Centered Design and Evaluation of an Upper Limb Rehabilitation System with a Virtual Environment. Applied Sciences, 11(20), 9500. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11209500
Rivera Robles, J., Bory Reyes, J., Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Hernández Simón, L. M., Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Palacios Hernández, J. I. E., & Instituto Politécnico Nacional. (2024). Rehabilitation Exoskeletons: A Systematic Literature Review. Revista Mexicana de Ingeniería Biomédica, 45(2), 78–99. https://doi.org/10.17488/RMIB.45.2.5
Rus, D., & Tolley, M. T. (2015). Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature, 521(7553), 467–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14543
Sabino, M. A., Loaiza, M., Dernowsek, J., & Rezende, R. (2017). Técnicas para la fabricación de andamios poliméricos con aplicaciones en Ingeniería de tejidos. 37(2), 1–27.
Song, T., Yan, Z., Guo, S., Li, Y., Li, X., & Xi, F. (2023). Review of sEMG for Robot Control: Techniques and Applications. Applied Sciences, 13(17), 9546. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179546
Turiel, J. P., Marinero, J. C. F., & Gonzalez, J. R. P. (2002). Aplicaciones de la Robótica: Últimas tendencias y nuevas perspectivas.
Vulpe, M., & Stancu, S. (2024). The Forever Robotics Rules? An Overview Analysis of Their Applicability Scaled Over Time from Isaac Asimov to Our Software Robots (Vol. 921). Springer.
Walker, J., Zidek, T., Harbel, C., Yoon, S., Strickland, F. S., Kumar, S., & Shin, M. (2020). Soft Robotics: A Review of Recent Developments of Pneumatic Soft Actuators. Actuators, 9(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/act9010003
Wallin, T. J., Pikul, J., & Shepherd, R. F. (2018). 3D printing of soft robotic systems. Nature Reviews Materials, 3(6), 84–100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-018-0002-2
Yang, C., Ma, H., & Fu, M. (2016). Robot Kinematics and Dynamics Modeling. In C. Yang, H. Ma, & M. Fu, Advanced Technologies in Modern Robotic Applications (pp. 27–48). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0830-6_2
Yang, H. D., & Asbeck, A. T. (2018). A New Manufacturing Process for Soft Robots and Soft/Rigid Hybrid Robots. 2018 IEEE/RSJ
International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 8039–8046. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2018.8593688
Zagoya-López, J., Zúñiga-Avilés, L. A., Vilchis-González, A. H., & Ávila-Vilchis, J. C. (2021). Foot/Ankle Prostheses Design Approach Based on Scientometric and Patentometric Analyses. Applied Sciences, 11(12), 5591. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125591
Zimmermann, E. A., & Ritchie, R. O. (2015). Bone as a Structural Material. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 4, 1287–1304.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2025 Juana Mariel Dávila-Vilchis, Adriana Herlinda Vilchis-González, Juan Carlos Ávila-Vilchis
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0.
