The symbolic–substantive gap: institutional masculinity and the politics of hiring and promotion in sport management organizations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51247/pdlc.v7iEspecial1.990Keywords:
institutional masculinity, gendered organizations, sport management, tokenism, hegemonic masculinity, hiring and promotionAbstract
This study aimed to analyze the causes of persistent gender inequality in international sports governance decision-making spaces, despite progress made in the symbolic and numerical representation of women. A qualitative research approach was developed, based on secondary data analysis. First, a quantitative synthesis of statistics published between 2024 and 2026 by the International Olympic Committee, FIFA, International Federations, and the International Paralympic Committee was conducted, presented in an original comparative graph. Second, a qualitative meta-synthesis of five empirical studies on sports organizations was performed, coded using Acker's (1990) theory of gendered organizations and Kanter's (1977) theory of tokenism. The analysis was also based on Connell and Messerschmidt's (2005) concept of hegemonic masculinity and Kerfoot and Knights' (1998) interpretation of management as a masculinized managerial project. The results revealed a persistent gap between symbolic representation and effective access to power, as female participation reached levels close to parity in governing bodies and commissions, but decreased considerably in federation presidencies and coaching positions. A significant exception was identified within the Paralympic movement, where women constituted a majority in an administrative body. It is concluded that numerical equality does not guarantee an effective redistribution of power, making it necessary to strengthen institutional reforms and develop comparative studies that explain the organizational factors that favor substantial female participation in sports governance. Keywords: institutional masculinity; gendered organizations; sports management; tokenism; hegemonic masculinity; recruitment and promotion.
Downloads
References
Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002
Adriaanse, J. (2016). Gender diversity in the governance of sport associations: The Sydney Scoreboard Global Index of Participation. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(1), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2550-3 (Advance online publication 2015.)
Betzer-Tayar, M., Zach, S., Galily, Y., & Henry, I. (2017). Barriers to women's access to decision-making positions in sport organizations: The case of establishing a girls' volleyball academy in Israel. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(4), 418–431.
Claringbould, I., & Knoppers, A. (2007). Finding a "normal" woman: Selection processes for board membership. Sex Roles, 56(7–8), 495–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9188-2
Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639
Espinoza Freire, E. E. (2020). La búsqueda de información científica en las bases de datos académicas. Revista Metropolitana de Ciencias Aplicadas, 3(1), 31-35.
Evans, A. B., & Pfister, G. U. (2021). Women in sports leadership: A systematic narrative review. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 56(6), 317–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690220911842
Hoeber, L. (2007). "It's somewhere on the list but maybe it's one of the bottom ones": Examining gender equity as an organization value in a sport organization. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 2(4), 362–378.
Hovden, J. (2000). "Heavyweight" men and younger women? The gendering of selection processes in Norwegian sport organizations. NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 8(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/080387400408035
International Olympic Committee. (2025). Gender equality and inclusion progress report 2021–2024. IOC.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. Basic Books.
Kerfoot, D., & Knights, D. (1998). Managing masculinity in contemporary organizational life: A "man"agerial project. Organization, 5(1), 7–26.
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer Publishing Company.
Schoch, L., & Clausen, J. (2019). Women within international sports federations: Contemporary challenges. In G. Cervin & C. Nicolas (Eds.), Histories of women's work in global sport (pp. 273–292). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26909-8_12
Shaw, S., & Frisby, W. (2006). Can gender equity be more equitable?: Promoting an alternative frame for sport management research, education, and practice. Journal of Sport Management, 20(4), 483–509.
UN Women. (2026). Facts and figures: Women in sport. UN Women.
Women's Sports Foundation. (2025). Beyond the podium: A women's sports foundation research report on the 2024 Olympic and Paralympic Games.
Yoder, J. D. (1991). Rethinking tokenism: Looking beyond numbers. Gender & Society, 5(2), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124391005002003
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mohamed Chelali
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
