O conjunto Alemanha-França e a crise da zona euro
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51247/st.v7i1.408Palavras-chave:
tandem Alemanha-França, crise do euro, Mercosul, União EuropeiaResumo
Para compreender o desenvolvimento das negociações entre o Mercosul e a União Europeia é necessário conhecer as relações dentro destes dois blocos. Do lado europeu está a centralidade do conjunto Alemanha-França, em oposição ao conjunto Brasil-Argentina do lado do Mercosul. O objetivo desta revisão bibliográfica é analisar a dinâmica de funcionamento do referido conjunto europeu no contexto da crise da Zona Euro. Neste estudo foi utilizada metodologia com abordagem descritiva apoiada em revisão documental e métodos hermenêuticos; bem como na técnica de análise de conteúdo. Conclui-se que as tensões, alinhamentos e realinhamentos nacionais durante a referida crise oferecem o material necessário para analisar a crise da liderança europeia juntamente com a formação de diferentes coligações (credores vs. devedores, contribuintes líquidos vs. beneficiários líquidos, defensores da propriedade agrária comum política versus oponentes de la, entre outros). A crise do conjunto franco-alemão aprofundou a dualização do continente, diferenciando dois blocos, um no sul, que inclui a França, e outro em torno do sistema de produção alemão, com relações comerciais dentro deles.
Downloads
Referências
Ágh, A. (2016). The increasing core-periphery divide and new member states. Diverging from the European Union’s mainstream developments. En J. M. Magone, B. Laffan, & C. Schweiger (Eds.), Core-periphery Relations in the European Union. Power and conflict in a dualist political economy, (pp. 117-129). Londres: Routledge.
Becker, J. (2012). Blindstellen: Ungleiche Entwicklung und ungleiche Mobilisierung in der EU. PROKLA, 42(168), 467-476.
Bieling, H. J., y Guntrum, S. (2019). Einleitung: Ungleiche Entwicklung und asymmetrische Machtbeziehungen im Zeichen der Eurokrise. En H. J. Bieling & S. Guntrum (Eds.), Neue Segel, alter Kurs? Die Eurokrise und ihre Folgen für das europäische Wirtschaftsregieren, (pp. 1-20). Berlín: Springer VS.
Bulmer, S. y Paterson, W. E. (2013). Germany as the EU’s reluctant hegemon? Of economic strenght and political constraints. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(10), 1387-1405.
Bulmer Thomas, V. (2000). The European Union and MERCOSUR: Prospects for a Free Trade Agreement. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 42(1), 1-22.
Doctor, M. (2007). Why Bother With Inter-Regionalism? Negotiations for a European Union-Mercosur Agreement. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(2), 281-314.
Dräger, K. (2011). Europäische Wirtschaftsregierung: EU auf dem Weg zum, Deutschen Europa? Widerspruch: Beiträge zu sozialistischer Politik, 31(61), 21-35.
Faust, J. (2002). The European Union’s Trade Policy towards MERCOSUR. Working Paper PEIF-7. Mainz. https://www.politik.uni-
mainz.de/Bereich/bereich1211/Deutsch/Leitung/index.htm
Galgóczi, B. (2016). The southern and eastern peripheries in Europe. Is convergence a lost cause? En J. M. Magone, B. Laffan, & C. Schweiger (Eds.), Core-periphery Relations in the European Union. Power and conflict in a dualist political economy, (pp. 130-145). Londres: Routledge.
García, M. (2012). The European Union and Latin America: Transformative power Europe versus the realities of economic interests. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 28, 621-640. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2011.647762
Gräbner, C., Heimberger, P., Kapeller, J. y Schütz, B. (2020). Is the Eurozone disintegrating? Macroeconomic divergence, structural polarisation, trade and fragility. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 44, 647-669.
Guérot, U. y Klau, T. (2012). After Merkozy: How France and Germany can make Europe work. European Council on Foreign Relations, 56, 1-16.
Hayward, J. (2012). National Governments, the European Council and Councils of Ministers: A Plurality of Sovereignties. Member State Sovereigns without an EU Sovereign. En J. Hayward & R. Wurzel (Eds.), European Disunion. Between Sovereignty and Solidarity, (pp. 65-81). Londres: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kirchner, E. J. (1996). Germany and the European Union: From Junior to Senior Role. En G. Smith, W. E. Paterson, & S. Padgett (Eds.). Developments in German Politics 2. Londres: Macmillan.
Konold, D. (2010). Farm Interests ar Bargaining Chips: France in the EU-Mercosur Free Trade Negotiations. Journal of Public Policy, 30(3), 321-343.
Lapavitsas, C., Kaltenbrunner, A., Lindo, D., Michell, J., Painceira, J. P., Pires, E., Powell, J., Stenfors, A. y Teles, N. (2010). Eurozone crisis: Beggar thyself and thy neighbour. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 12(4), 321-373.
Lehne, S. (2012). The Big Three in EU Foreign Policy. Carnegie Europe. https://carnegieeurope.eu/2012/07/05/big-three-in-eu-foreign-policy-pub-48759
Magone, J. M., Laffan, B. y Schweiger, C. (2016). The European Union as a dualist political economy. Understanding core-periphery relations. En J. M. Magone, B. Laffan, & C. Schweiger (Eds.), Core-periphery Relations in the European Union. Power and conflict in a dualist political economy, (pp. 1-16). Londres: Taylor & Fancis. doi:10.4324/9781315712994.
Makuc, A., Duhalde, G. y Rozemberg, R. (2015). La Negociación MERCOSUR-Unión Europea a Veinte Años del Acuerdo Marco de Cooperación: Quo Vadis?. Washington: BID.
Matthijs, M. (2014). Mediterranean Blues: The Crisis in Southern Europe. Journal of Democracy, 25(1), 101-115.
Meunier, S. y Nicolaïdis, K. (2006). The European Union as a conflicted trade power. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(6), 906-925.
Morisse Schilbach, M. (2011). Ach Deutschland! Greece, the Euro Crisis, and the Costs and Benefits of Being a Benign Hegemon. Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft, 1, 26-41.
Paradero Huerta, I. (2016). Sociopolitical divisions in the European Union. Discourses of southern European representatives in the European institutions. En J. M. Magone, B. Laffan, & C. Schweiger (Eds.), Core-periphery Relations in the European Union. Power and conflict in a dualist political economy, (pp. 99-116). Londres: Routledge.
Pasquali, M. L. (2016). The Impact of Eastern Enlargement on the European Union’s Foreign Policy towards Latin America and the Caribbean (2004-2016). Europa-Kolleg Hamburg. Study Paper N.o 03/16. https://europa-kolleg-hamburg.de/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/study-paper_Pasquali.pdf
Paterson, W. E. (2010). Does Germany Still Have a European Vocation? German Politics, 19(1), 41-52.
____________ (2011). The Reluctant Hegemon? Germany Moves Centre Stage in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 49, 57-75.
____________ (2012). A Contested Franco-German Duumvirate. En J. Hayward & R. Wurzel (Eds.), European Disunion. Between Sovereignty and Solidarity (pp. 235-251). Londres: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sánchez Bajo, C. (1999). The European Union and Mercosur: A case of inter-regionalism. Third World Quarterly, 20(5), 927-941.
Sandbeck, S. y Schneider, E. (2014). From the Sovereign Debt Crisis to Authoritarian Statism: Contradictions of the European State Project. New Political Economy, 19(6), 847-871.
Santander, S. (2005). The European Partnership with Mercosur: A Relationship Based on Strategic and Neo-liberal Principles. European Integration, 27(3), 285-306.
Schneider, E. y Sandbeck, S. (2018). Monetary integration in the Eurozone and the rise of transnational authoritarian statism. Competition & Change, 0(0), 1-27.
Schneider, E. y Syrovatka, F. (2019). Die Europäische Wirtschaftsunion zwischen Vertiefung und Desintegration. Blockade und wachsende Asymmetrie zwischen Deutschland und Frankreich. En H. J. Bieling & S. Guntrum (Eds.), Neue Segel, alter Kurs? Die Eurokrise und ihre Folgen für das europäische Wirtschaftsregieren, (pp. 21-59). Berlín: Springer VS.
Schweiger, C. (2016). National interests and differentiated integration in the EU under crisis conditions. The cases of Germany, France and Britain. En J. M. Magone, B. Laffan, & C. Schweiger (Eds.), Core-periphery Relations in the European Union. Power and conflict in a dualist political economy, (pp. 59-71). Londres: Routledge.
Sepos, A. (2016). The centre-periphery divide in the Eurocrisis. A theoretical approach. En J. M. Magone, B. Laffan, & C. Schweiger (Eds.), Core-periphery Relations in the European Union. Power and conflict in a dualist political economy, (pp. 35-55). Londres: Routledge.
Syrovatka, F., Schneider, E. y Sablowski, T. (2018). Ten Years of Crisis. European Economic Integration Between Silent Revolution and Breakup. Berlin: Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2024 Alejandro Marcelo Jaquenod
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0.
