Análisis ecocrítico del poema Sea Songs a través del enfoque de la tercera ola de la ecocrítica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51247/st.v9i1.694Palabras clave:
ecocrítica, tercera ola, antropocentrismo, naturaleza, libros escolaresResumen
Este artículo presenta un análisis ecocrítico del poema Sea Songs (traducido al griego como Θαλασσινά Τραγούδια), incluido en el libro escolar griego Textos de Literatura Neogriega para el Primer Grado de Secundaria (Κείμενα Νεοελληνικής Λογοτεχνίας της Α’ Γυμνασίου). El objetivo principal del estudio fue identificar y analizar los significados ecológicos implícitos del poema que trascienden sus representaciones superficiales de belleza idílica, a partir del marco teórico de la tercera ola de la ecocrítica, conceptualizado por Buell (2005) y desarrollado por Heise (2008). La metodología fue cualitativa e interpretativa, basada en el análisis textual y discursivo del poema, con énfasis en el lenguaje poético, las metáforas y los símiles. Este enfoque permitió examinar cómo dichos recursos construyen una concepción específica de la “naturaleza” en el texto escolar. El análisis reveló que, pese a una aparente armonía inicial, subyacen dinámicas complejas como el antropocentrismo, la reducción de la autonomía del mundo no humano y la apropiación simbólica del paisaje natural. Entre los principales hallazgos se evidenció que la presencia humana, aun cuando parecía integrarse de manera armónica con la naturaleza, influye activamente en su significado y contribuye a neutralizar la agencia de los seres no humanos. En conclusión, el estudio pone de manifiesto la necesidad de promover lecturas más críticas y reflexivas de los textos educativos, cuestionando la hegemonía antropocéntrica y destacando el potencial formativo de la ecocrítica en el ámbito pedagógico (Iovino & Oppermann, 2014).
Descargas
Citas
Abram, D. (1996). The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human World. New York: Pantheon Books.
Alaimo, S. (2010). Bodily natures: Science, environment, and the material self. Indiana University Press.
Armbruster, K., & Wallace, K. R. (2001). Beyond Nature Writing: Expanding the Boundaries of Ecocriticism. University of Virginia Press.
Baker, S. (2001). Picturing the Beast: Animals, Identity, and Representation (New ed.). (p. 112) University of Illinois Press.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. (pp. xvi–xvii, pp. 31–35) Duke University Press.
Bernaerts, L., De Geest, D., Herman, L., & Vervaeck, B. (2014). “Narrative Theories and Criticism”. In P. Hühn (Ed.), The Living Handbook of Narratology (pp. 67–85). Hamburg University Press.
Bernaerts, L., Caracciolo, M., Herman, L., & Vervaeck, B. (2014). The storied lives of non-human narrators. Narrative, 22(1), 68–93. https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2014.0005
Bonneuil, C., & Fressoz, J.-B. (2013). L’événement Anthropocène: La Terre, l’histoire et nous. (pp. 29–35) Le Seuil.
Bonneuil, C., & Fressoz, J.-B. (2013). The shock of the Anthropocene: The Earth, history, and us. Verso.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.
Buell, L. (2005). The Future of Environmental Criticism: Environmental Crisis and Literary Imagination (pp. 137–143). Blackwell.
Chakrabarty, D. (2009). The climate of history: Four theses. Critical Inquiry, 35(2), 197–222. https://doi.org/10.1086/596640
Chakrabarty, D. (2021). The Climate of History in a Planetary Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Clark, T. (2015). Ecocriticism on the Edge: The Anthropocene as a Threshold Concept. London: Bloomsbury.
Cohen, J. J. (2012). Stone: An Ecology of the Inhuman. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Despret, V. (2013). Que diraient les animaux... si on leur posait les bonnes questions ? Paris : La Découverte.
Gaard, G. (2017). Critical Ecofeminism. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Garrard, G. (2012). Ecocriticism (2nd ed., pp. 3–25, pp. 94–97). Routledge.
Ghosh, A. (2016). The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Glotfelty, C., & Fromm, H. (Eds.). (1996). The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Goga, N., Guanio-Uluru, L., Hallås, B. O., & Nyrnes, A. (2018). Ecocritical Perspectives on Children's Texts and Cultures: Nordic Dialogues (pp. 73–76). Palgrave Macmillan.
Haraway, D. J. (2008). When Species Meet. (pp. 3–7, pp. 15–20) University of Minnesota Press.
Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. (pp. 2–4, pp. 30–33) Duke University Press.
Heise, U. K. (2008). Sense of Place and Sense of Planet: The Environmental Imagination of the Global (pp. 121–129). Oxford University Press.
Heise, U. K. (2016). Imagining Extinction: The Cultural Meanings of Endangered Species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Huggan, G., & Tiffin, H. (2015). Postcolonial Ecocriticism: Literature, Animals, Environment (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2019). Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate. (H.-O. Pörtner et al., Eds.). Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/srocc/
Iovino, S., & Oppermann, S. (2014). Material Ecocriticism (pp. 1–10). Indiana University Press.
Latour, B. (1993). Nous n’avons jamais été modernes: Essai d’anthropologie symétrique. (pp. 7–13, pp. 37–42, pp. 103–105) La Découverte.
Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern (C. Porter, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2018). Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Morton, T. (2007). Ecology without Nature: Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics. (pp. 1–6, pp. 19–22, pp. 130–131) Harvard University Press.
Morton, T. (2010). The ecological thought. Harvard University Press.
Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. (pp. 1–3, pp. 98–101) University of Minnesota Press.
Morton, T. (2016). Dark Ecology: For a Logic of Future Coexistence. (pp. 4–9, pp. 54–55, pp. 102–105) Columbia University Press.
Neimanis, A. (2017). Bodies of Water: Posthuman Feminist Phenomenology. (p. 126) Bloomsbury Academic.
Nixon, R. (2011). Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Oppermann, S. (2016). “From Ecological Postmodernism to Material Ecocriticism: Creative Materiality and Narrative Agency.” In B. Clarke & M. Rossini (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Literature and the Environment (pp. 8–23). Cambridge University Press.
Oppermann, S. (2016). “From Ecological Postmodernism to Material Ecocriticism: Creative Materiality and Narrative Agency.” In S. Oppermann & S. Iovino (Eds.), Environmental Humanities: Voices from the Anthropocene (pp. 9–25). London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Oppermann, S., & Serenella, I. (2017). “Mediterranean Ecocriticism and the Blue Humanities.” ISLE: Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 24(3), 421–437.
Pauly, D., & Zeller, D. (2016). Catch reconstructions reveal that global marine fisheries catches are higher than reported and declining. Nature Communications, 7, 10244. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10244
Rueckert, W. (1996). Literature and Ecology: An Experiment in Ecocriticism. In C.
Glotfelty & H. Fromm (Eds.), The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology (pp. 105-123). University of Georgia Press.
Sheller, M. (2020). Island Futures: Caribbean Survival in the Anthropocene. (pp. 4–5) Duke University Press.
Slovic, S. (2022). “Ecocriticism in Education: Expanding the Environmental Humanities.” ISLE: Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 29(2), 201–215.
Weilgart, L. S. (2007). The impacts of anthropogenic ocean noise on cetaceans and implications for management. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 85(11), 1091–1116.
Wolfe, C. (2010). What is Posthumanism ? Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Aikaterini Vergetani-Peirasmaki
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
