Challenges and advances in rehabilitation robotics: a focus on inclusion and innovation

Authors

  • Adrián Camacho-Ramírez Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7123-6833
  • Juan Carlos Ávila-Vilchis Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México
  • Adriana Herlinda Vilchis-González Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51247/st.v8iS1.558

Keywords:

Innovación, dispositivo médico, rehabilitación, robótica.

Abstract

This review article aims to highlight the importance of using rehabilitation robots in improving the quality of life of people undergoing functional recovery processes. A comprehensive review of the scientific and technical literature available in specialized databases was conducted, complemented by the authors' experience in the field of rehabilitation robotics. The review highlights the potential of rehabilitation robots to provide effective, accessible and personalized therapies. These devices do not seek to replace therapists, but rather to assist them, allowing for increased care capacity and reduced treatment times. Significant advances were identified in the design of adaptable robots, the integration of artificial intelligence technologies and the implementation of feedback systems to improve the effectiveness of rehabilitation. It is concluded that rehabilitation robotics represents a valuable tool to improve the quality of life of people undergoing functional recovery processes. Despite existing challenges, such as lack of investment in research and dependence on foreign technologies, academic interest and collaboration between institutions suggest a promising future for the development and implementation of these technologies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Camacho-Ramirez, A., Ávila-Vilchis, J. C., Saldivar, B., Vilchis-González, A. H., & Jacinto-Villegas, J. M. (2022). Adjustable Stiffness-Based Supination–Pronation Forearm Physical Rehabilitator. Applied Sciences, 12(12), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12126164

Chellal, A. A., Lima, J., Fernandes, F. P., Gonçalves, J., Pacheco, M. F., & Monteiro, F. C. (2021). Overview of Robotic Based System for Rehabilitation and Healthcare. En A. I. Pereira, F. P. Fernandes, J. P. Coelho, J. P. Teixeira, M. F. Pacheco, P. Alves, & R. P. Lopes (Eds.), Optimization, Learning Algorithms and Applications (pp. 515-530). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91885-9_38

Cooper, R. A., Dicianno, B. E., Brewer, B., LoPresti, E., Ding, D., Simpson, R., Grindle, G., & Wang, H. (2008). A perspective on intelligent devices and environments in medical rehabilitation. Medical Engineering & Physics, 30(10), 1387-1398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.09.003

Cortés, F. V., & Islas, D. S. C. (2021). La brecha digital como una nueva capa de vulnerabilidad que afecta el acceso a la educación en México. Academia y Virtualidad, 14(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.18359/ravi.5395

Costa, Ú., & Díez, S. (2019). Robótica para la rehabilitación. Sobre ruedas, Tech. Rep, 102, 16-20. https://siidon.guttmann.com/files/sr_102_robotica_costa_diez.pdf

Cruz Martínez, G. M., & Z. -Avilés, L. A. (2020). Design Methodology for Rehabilitation Robots: Application in an Exoskeleton for Upper Limb Rehabilitation. Applied Sciences, 10(16), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10165459

De la Cruz-Sanchez, B. A., Arias-Montiel, M., & Lugo-González, E. (2022). EMG-controlled hand exoskeleton for assisted bilateral rehabilitation. Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, 42(2), 596-614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbe.2022.04.001

Díaz, I., Gil, J. J., & Sánchez, E. (2011). Lower-Limb Robotic Rehabilitation: Literature Review and Challenges. Journal of Robotics, 2011(1), 759764. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/759764

Giangarra, C. E., & Manske, R. C. (2017). Clinical Orthopaedic Rehabilitation: A Team Approach E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences.

Góngora Jaramillo, E. M. (2021). Financiamiento por concurso para investigación científica en México: Lógicas de competencia y experiencias de científicos. Revista mexicana de investigación educativa, 26(88), 149-172. https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/rmie/v26n88/1405-6666-rmie-26-88-149.pdf

González-Mendoza, A., Quiñones-Urióstegui, I., Salazar-Cruz, S., Perez-Sanpablo, A.-I., López-Gutiérrez, R., & Lozano, R. (2022). Design and Implementation of a Rehabilitation Upper-limb Exoskeleton Robot Controlled by Cognitive and Physical Interfaces. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 19(5), 1374-1391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-022-00214-z

Harwin, W. S., Murgia, A., & Stokes, E. K. (2011). Assessing the effectiveness of robot facilitated neurorehabilitation for relearning motor skills following a stroke. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 49(10), 1093-1102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-011-0799-y

Hernandez, E., Valdez, S. I., Carbone, G., & Ceccarelli, M. (2018). Design Optimization of a Cable-Driven Parallel Robot in Upper Arm Training-Rehabilitation Processes. En J. C. M. Carvalho, D. Martins, R. Simoni, & H. Simas (Eds.), Multibody Mechatronic Systems (pp. 413-423). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67567-1_39

Hidler, J., & Lum, P. S. (2011). The road ahead for rehabilitation robotics. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 48(4), vii. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.02.0014

INEGI. (2020). Presentación de resultados. Estados Unidos Mexicanos (Censo de Población y Vivienda 2020). https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/programas/ccpv/2020/doc/Censo2020_Principales_resultados_EUM.pdf

Khin, R. A., Carlos, M. M. R., Badillo, G., Guillermina, G. M., & Jimmy, J. R. J. (2020). Diseño de exoesqueleto de tres grados de libertad para miembro superior. 9(3). http://www.mecamex.net/revistas/LMEM/revistas/LMEM-V09-N03-01.pdf

Kristoffersson, A., Coradeschi, S., Loutfi, A., & Severinson-Eklundh, K. (2011). An Exploratory Study of Health Professionals’ Attitudes about Robotic Telepresence Technology. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 29(4), 263-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2011.639509

Laut, J., Porfiri, M., & Raghavan, P. (2016). The Present and Future of Robotic Technology in Rehabilitation. Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports, 4(4), 312-319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40141-016-0139-0

Leite, I., Pereira, A., Mascarenhas, S., Martinho, C., Prada, R., & Paiva, A. (2013). The influence of empathy in human–robot relations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71(3), 250-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.09.005

Levac, D. E., & Galvin, J. (2013). When Is Virtual Reality “Therapy”? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94(4), 795-798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.10.021

Marchal-Crespo, L., & Reinkensmeyer, D. J. (2009). Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 6(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-6-20

Martinez-Peon, D., Olguín-Díaz, E., Muñoz-Vázquez, A. J., Francisco, P. C., & Méndez, D. S. (2021). Modeling and control of exoskeleton for wrist and forearm rehabilitation. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 70, 103022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103022

Masiero, S., Poli, P., Rosati, G., Zanotto, D., Iosa, M., Paolucci, S., & Morone, G. (2014). The value of robotic systems in stroke rehabilitation. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 11(2), 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1586/17434440.2014.882766

Méndez, D. S., Montiel, M. A., & González, E. L. (2017). Diseño de un Prototipo de Exoesqueleto para Rehabilitación del Hombro. Revista Mexicana de Ingenieria Biomedica, 38(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.17488/RMIB.38.1.29

Meneses Castaño, C., Penagos, P., & Yamile Jaramillo, B. (2023). Efectividad de la tecnología robótica y la realidad virtual para la rehabilitación de la función motora en la parálisis cerebral. Revisión sistemática. Rehabilitación, 57(3), 100752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rh.2022.07.001

Navarrete, G. A., Baca, Y. R., Villanueva, D., & Martínez, D. (2018). ROBMMOR: An Experimental Robotic Manipulator for Motor Rehabilitation of Knee. En I. Batyrshin, M. de L. Martínez-Villaseñor, & H. E. Ponce Espinosa (Eds.), Advances in Computational Intelligence (pp. 304-317). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04497-8_25

Núñez, A. Y. A., López, S. L., Rodríguez, J. H. D., & Riva, D. V. de la. (2014). La rehabilitación física de mujeres mastectomizadas desde la perspectiva de ciencia, tecnología y sociedad. Mediciego, 20(2). https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumen.cgi?IDARTICULO=53666

Organization, W. H. (2022). Global report on health equity for persons with disabilities. World Health Organization.

Pérez-San Lázaro, R., Salgado, I., & Chairez, I. (2021). Adaptive sliding-mode controller of a lower limb mobile exoskeleton for active rehabilitation. ISA Transactions, 109, 218-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2020.10.008

Pisla, D., Tarnita, D., Tucan, P., Tohanean, N., Vaida, C., Geonea, I. D., Bogdan, G., Abrudan, C., Carbone, G., & Plitea, N. (2021). A Parallel Robot with Torque Monitoring for Brachial Monoparesis Rehabilitation Tasks. Applied Sciences, 11(21), Article 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11219932

RED DE INDICADORES DE CIENCIA Y TECNOLOGÍA. (2023). El estado de la ciencia Principales Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología Iberoamericanos / Interamericanos 2023. https://www.ricyt.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/EL-ESTADO-DE-LA-CIENCIA-2023.pdf

Sandoval-Gonzalez, O., Jacinto-Villegas, J., Herrera-Aguilar, I., Portillo-Rodiguez, O., Tripicchio, P., Hernandez-Ramos, M., Flores-Cuautle, A., & Avizzano, C. (2016). Design and Development of a Hand Exoskeleton Robot for Active and Passive Rehabilitation. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 13(2), 66. https://doi.org/10.5772/62404

Secretaría de Educación Pública. (2023). Principales Cifras del Sistema Educativo Nacional 2022-2023. https://www.planeacion.sep.gob.mx/Doc/estadistica_e_indicadores/principales_cifras/principales_cifras_2022_2023_bolsillo.pdf

Tellaeche, J. R. (2020). Los retos de la economía mexicana: Comercio, inversión extranjera, industria nacional y cambio tecnológico / The challenges of the Mexican economy: trade, foreign investment, domestic industry and technological change. EconomíaUNAM, 17(51), Article 51. https://doi.org/10.22201/fe.24488143e.2020.51.576

UNESCO. (2017). UNESCO moving forwardthe 2030 Agendafor Sustainable Development. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247785/PDF/247785eng.pdf.multi

Valdez, S. I., Gutierrez-Carmona, I., Keshtkar, S., & Hernandez, E. E. (2020). Kinematic and dynamic design and optimization of a parallel rehabilitation robot. Intelligent Service Robotics, 13(3), 365-378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-020-00319-6

Veléz-Díaz, D., Pozo-Méndez, A., Gudiño-Lau, J., Alcala, J., & Charre-Ibarra, S. (2020). Diseño y co-simulación de un exoesqueleto. XIKUA Boletín Científico de la Escuela Superior de Tlahuelilpan, 8(16), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.29057/xikua.v8i16.5946

Vidrios-Serrano, C. A., Maldonado-Fregoso, B. R., Bonilla-Gutiérrez, I., Mendoza-Gutiérrez, M. O., & González-Galván, E. J. (2018). Integración de un Sistema Robótico de Terapia Ocupacional para Extremidades Superiores con Estimulación Visual/Táctil de Los Pacientes. Revista Mexicana de Ingenieria Biomedica, 39(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.17488/RMIB.39.2.2

Wagner, T. H., Lo, A. C., Peduzzi, P., Bravata, D. M., Huang, G. D., Krebs, H. I., Ringer, R. J., Federman, D. G., Richards, L. G., Haselkorn, J. K., Wittenberg, G. F., Volpe, B. T., Bever, C. T., Duncan, P. W., Siroka, A., & Guarino, P. D. (2011). An Economic Analysis of Robot-Assisted Therapy for Long-Term Upper-Limb Impairment After Stroke. Stroke, 42(9), 2630-2632. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.606442

World Bank Open Data. (s. f.). World Bank Open Data. Recuperado 27 de agosto de 2024, de https://data.worldbank.org

Yakub, F., Md. Khudzari, A. Z., & Mori, Y. (2014). Recent trends for practical rehabilitation robotics, current challenges and the future. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 37(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000035

Zhang, M., Davies, T. C., & Xie, S. (2013). Effectiveness of robot-assisted therapy on ankle rehabilitation – a systematic review. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 10(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-30

Downloads

Published

2025-04-01

How to Cite

Challenges and advances in rehabilitation robotics: a focus on inclusion and innovation. (2025). Society & Technology, 8, 18-38. https://doi.org/10.51247/st.v8iS1.558

Similar Articles

1-10 of 76

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)