The nullity of Resolutions Issued by the Office of the Comptroller General of the State Due to Lack of Jurisdiction in Ecuador

Authors

  • Pedro Pablo Campozano-Cruz ube
  • Gilda Cecilia Herrera-Herrera Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51247/st.v8iS2.656

Keywords:

Control action, resolution, notification, expiration, jurisdiction, CGE.

Abstract

The administrative oversight exercised by the Comptroller General's Office (CGE) in Ecuador faces crucial challenges related to competition, compliance with deadlines, and the expiration of resolutions. The CGE plays a fundamental role in ensuring transparency and the proper use of public resources; however, the failure to issue resolutions in a timely manner negatively affects the effectiveness of its functions and generates uncertainty for both audited entities and the public. The main problem in this situation lies in the violation of the rights of those being audited, as excessive procedural timelines can invalidate the sanctions imposed and delegitimize oversight. The research question focuses on how the expiration of resolutions and the lack of competition in oversight processes impact the efficiency of the CGE, undermining public trust in state institutions and hindering the development of public policies. This study is justified by the need to optimize the CGE's internal processes to ensure that resolutions are issued within the established legal deadlines, thereby improving the efficiency of administrative oversight and strengthening trust in the system. The objective is to analyze the scope of the powers of the State Comptroller General's Office, to determine and report responsibilities as a result of the oversight actions it carries out.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Corte Nacional de Justicia. (2024). Resolución No. 2024-13. Recuperado de https://www.corteconstitucional.gob.ec

Corte Nacional de Justicia. (2022). Resolución No. 2022-08. Recuperado de https://www.corteconstitucional.gob.ec

Corte Nacional de Justicia. (2020). Resolución N° 1038-2020. Recuperado de https://www.corteconstitucional.gob.ec

Corte Nacional de Justicia. (2021). Resolución N° 760-2021. Recuperado de https://www.corteconstitucional.gob.ec

Corte Nacional de Justicia. (2021). Resolución N° 838-2021. Recuperado de https://www.corteconstitucional.gob.ec

Corte Nacional de Justicia. (2021). Resolución N° 860-2021. Recuperado de https://www.corteconstitucional.gob.ec

Corte Nacional de Justicia. (2021). Jurisprudencia sobre caducidad y competencia. Recuperado de https://www.corteconstitucional.gob.ec

Contraloría General del Estado. (2021). Informe de auditoría sobre el uso de recursos públicos. Recuperado de https://www.contraloria.gob.ec

Contraloría General del Estado. (2019). Informes de Responsabilidades. Recuperado de https://www.contraloria.gob.ec

Constitución de la República del Ecuador. (2008). Recuperado de https://www.asambleanacional.gob.ec

Ley Orgánica de la Contraloría General del Estado. (2016). Recuperado de https://www.contraloria.gob.ec

Pérez, J. (2020). La competencia de la Contraloría General del Estado en Ecuador. Revista de Derecho Administrativo, 15(2), 45-67. Recuperado de https://www.revistaderechoadministrativo.com

Núñez, M. (2021). Eficiencia en el control administrativo: Un análisis de la Contraloría General del Estado. Revista de Estudios Públicos, 12(1), 113-130. Recuperado de https://www.revistaestudiospublicos.com

Zambrano, L. (2022). Confianza pública y control administrativo en Ecuador. Análisis y Propuestas, 8(3), 96-110. Recuperado de https://www.analisispropuestas.com

Downloads

Published

2025-09-01

How to Cite

The nullity of Resolutions Issued by the Office of the Comptroller General of the State Due to Lack of Jurisdiction in Ecuador. (2025). Society & Technology, 8, 558-572. https://doi.org/10.51247/st.v8iS2.656

Similar Articles

1-10 of 464

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)