Rethinking Sustainability in ICT4D Initiatives through Implementation Outcomes: Rethinking Sustainability in ICT4D Initiatives through Implementation Outcomes

Faith  Chauke; Hossana Twinomurinzi; Maria Lauda J. Goyayi

doi:10.51247/st.v8i2.519

Authors

Faith Chauke School of Computing, University of South Africa, Florida, South Africa
Hossana Twinomurinzi Center for Applied Data Science https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9811-3358
Maria Lauda J. Goyayi University of Johannesburg https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5696-136X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51247/st.v8i2.519

Keywords:

ICT for development (ICT4D); open development; implementation outcomes; project sustainability; information systems (is)

Abstract

Information and Communication Technology for Development (ICT4D) community initiatives tend to “fizzle” out after a few years. This study, therefore, investigated alternative ways in which these initiatives can be sustained for longer. The study drew on the Implementation Outcomes framework from the public health sector which holistically assesses the ability of public health initiatives to survive beyond their inception. With the objective to identify how improvements can be made on ICT4D initiatives so they are sustainable the study employed the qualitative-interpretive case study paradigm using three well-known South African ICT4D initiatives, namely, the Siyabuswa Educational Improvement and Development Trust (SEIDET), the Siyakhula Living Lab (SLL) and the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) Cyber Security Awareness Project. Findings reveals how individuals and the community for whom these initiatives are intended, sooner or later relocate or move on, as does ICT . Additionally, findings highlights the importance of ensuring a dynamic skills transfer from the founders of the initiative to later champions. The study makes a theoretical and practical contribution to Information Systems (IS) and ICT4D research by using a framework from the public health sector for IS and ICT4D initiatives. It conceptualises a framework to guide the implementation of more sustainable ICT4D.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afful-Dadzie, E., Lartey, S. O., & Clottey, D. N. K. (2022). Agricultural information systems acceptance and continuance in rural communities: A consumption values perspective. Technology in Society, 68, 101934.

Bar, F. and Toyama, K. (2021). Information technologies & international development. Information Technologies & International Development. Available at https://itidjournal.org/index.php/itid/index.html [Accessed 12 November 2023]

Cabassa, L. J. and Baumann, A. A. (2020). A two-way street: Bridging implementation science and cultural adaptations of mental health treatments. Implementation Science, 8(1). doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-90.

Coetzee, L. L. (2019) Towards a framework to guide the development of ICT4D: A South African Perspective. Available at: https://scholar.sun.ac.za. (Accessed 20 June 2022).

Da Silva, A. P. et al. (2013). Beyond free lunch: Building sustainable ICT4D. Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL). Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2013_cr. [Accessed 03 July 2022].

Dearden, A., & Kleine, D. (2021). Interdisciplinarity, self-governance and dialogue: the participatory process underpinning the minimum ethical standards for ICTD/ICT4D research. Information Technology for Development, 27(2), 361-380.

Dini, A. A., Hatakka, M., Sæbø, Ø., & Thapa, D. (2023). A framework to understand the role of IS artifact in ICT4D. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 89(3), e12246.

Dony Martinus Sihotang, D. M., Purwandari, B., Eitiveni, I., Putri,M. F., Hidayanto, A. N. (2023). Factors influencing village information systems adoption in Indonesia: A qualitative study. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 89(5).

Egessa, M., Ogara, S. and Liyala, S. (2018) International Information Management Corporation. Available at: www.IST-Africa.org/Conference2018. [Accessed 03 June 2022].

Egessa, M., Ogara, S., & Liyala, S. (2020). Critical review of capability approach-based frameworks in information and communication technology for development (ICT4D). Available at: http://ir.jooust.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/9308 [Accessed 03 June 2022].

Frings-Hessami, V., & Sarker, A. (2022, February). Access to information two years after an ICT4D project in Bangladesh: New digital skills and traditional practices. In International Conference on Information (pp. 123-135). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Gasper, D. (2017). What is the capability approach? Its core, rationale, partners and dangers. In Development ethics (pp. 217-241). Routledge.

Gold, H.T., McDermott, C., Hoomans, T. et al. Cost data in implementation science: categories and approaches to costing. Implementation Sci 17, 11 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01172-6

Gow, G., Chowdhury, A., Ganpat, W., & Ramjattan, J. (2018). Enhancing ICT adoption and use through change leadership: technology stewardship training for caribbean agricultural communities of practice. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(3).

Heeks, R. (2017). Information and communication technology for development (ICT4D). Routledge.

Ika, L. & Hodgson, D. (2014). Learning from international development projects: Blending critical project studies and critical development studies. International Journal of Project Management, 32, 1182–1196

Khadjesari, Z., Boufkhed, S., Vitoratou, S., Schatte, L, Ziemann, A., Daskalopoulou, C., Uglik-Marucha, E., Sevdalis, N. & Hull, L. (2020). Implementation outcome instruments for use in physical healthcare settings: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 15, 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01027-6.

Kleine, D. (2009). ICT4What? - using the Choice Framework to operationalise the capability approach to development, 2009 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development.

Lawrence Neuman, W. (2014) Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. 7th ed. Available at: www.pearsoned.co.uk. [Accessed 03 June 2022].

Li, Y., Thomas, M. A., Rana, S. S., & Stoner, D. (2017).Continuing medical education on a Stick: Nepal as a test bed. Paperpresented at the 14th International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in developing Countries,Yogyakarta, Indonesia, May 22–24

Li, Y., Thomas, M. A., Stoner, D., & Rana, S. S. (2020). Citizen-centric capacity development for ICT4D: the case of continuing medical education on a stick. Information Technology for Development, 26(3), 458-476.

Masiero, S. and Bailur, S. (2021). Digital identity for development: The quest for justice and a research agenda. Information Technology for Development. Routledge, pp. 1–12. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2021.1859669.

Mamuye A, Nigatu AM, Chanyalew MA, Amor LB, Loukil S, Moyo C, Quarshie S, Antypas K, Tilahun, B. (2023). Facilitators and barriers to the sustainability of eHealth solutions in low-and middle-income countries: descriptive exploratory study. JMIR Formative Research, 7, e41487.

Mthoko, H. and Khene, C. (2017). Building theory in ICT4D evaluation: A comprehensive approach to assessing outcome and impact. Information Technology for Development, 24(5), 1-27. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2017.1315359org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1315359.

Naz, F. (2016, August). Understanding human well-being: How could Sen’s capability approach contribute?. In Forum for Social Economics. Routledge

Nkula, K. and Krauss, K.E.M. 2014. The Integration of ICTs in Marginalized schools in South Africa: Consideration for Understanding the Perceptions of In-Service Teachers and the Role of Training. In: J Steyn. and D, Van Greunen, (eds). ICTs for Inclusive Communities in Developing Societies. Proceedings of the 8th International Development Informatics Association Conference, held in Port Elizabeth, South Africa. ISBN: 978-0-620-63498-4 Pages 241-261.

Nyoni, N., & Bvuma, S. (2022, March). Factors affecting uptake and deployment of ICT4D initiative: Implementers' perspectives. In 2022 Conference on Information Communications Technology and Society (ICTAS) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

Osei-Bryson, K. M., & Bailey, A. (2019). Contextual reflections on innovations in an interconnected world: theoretical lenses and practical considerations in ICT4D–Part 2. Information Technology for Development, 25(1), 1-6.

Osmani, S. R. (2016). The capability approach and human development: some reflections. United Nations Development Porgramme: New York, NY, USA

Pade-Khene, C., Lannon, J. (2017). Learning to be sustainable in ICT for development: A citizen engagement initiative in South Africa. In: Choudrie, J., Islam, M., Wahid, F., Bass, J., Priyatma, J. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies for Development. ICT4D 2017. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 504. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59111-7_39

Pade, C., Mallinson, B. and Sewry, D. (2008). An elaboration of critical success factors for rural ICT project sustainability in developing countries: Exploring the DWESA case. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research. doi: 10.1080/15228053.2008.10856146.

Pallesen, H., Honore, H., Aadal, L., & Kjeldsen, S. S. (2022). Improved active participation among patients with severe acquired brain injury in early rehabilitation. Implementation of a professional competence development intervention. Work, (Preprint), 1-16.

Phahlamohlaka, J. et al. (2010). From simulating citizen – government interaction to facilitating service delivery through ICT use: Experiences from the web-based collaboration and thinkLets project. In: Lubega, J., Vries, W. De, and Miscione, G. (eds) ICT anddevelopment: Research voices from Africa, IFIP WG9.4. Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda: IFIP WG9.4, pp. 1–11.

Proctor, E. K., Bunger, A. C., Lengnick-Hall, R., Gerke, D. R., Martin, J. K., Phillips, R. J., & Swanson, J. C. (2023). Ten years of implementation outcomes research: A scoping review. Implementation Science, 18(1), 1-19.

Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health and Ment Health Serv Res. 38, 65–76. Routledge Publishing.

Renken, J., & Heeks, R. (2013). Conceptualising ICT4D project champions. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information and Communications Technologies and Development: Notes-Volume 2.

Robeyns, I. (2021). The capability approach. In The Routledge handbook of feminist economics (pp. 72-80). Routledge.

Rudd, B. N., Davis, M., & Beidas, R. S. (2020). Integrating implementation science in clinical research to maximize public health impact: A call for the reporting and alignment of implementation strategy use with implementation outcomes in clinical research. Implementation Science, 15(1), 1-11.

Saha, M., Varghese, D., Bartindale, T., Thilsted, S. H., Ahmed, S. I., & Olivier, P. (2022). Towards sustainable ICTD in Bangladesh: understanding the program and policy landscape and its implications for CSCW and HCI. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(CSCW1), 1-31.

Sanner, T. A., & Sæbø, J. I. (2014). Paying per diems for ICT4D project participation: A sustainability challenge. Information Technologies & International Development, 10(2), pp-33.

Sen, A. (2000). Development as freedom. Development in Practice-Oxford-, 10(2), 258-258.

Sein, M. K., Thapa, D., Hatakka, M., & Sæbø, Ø. (2019). A holistic perspective on the theoretical foundations for ICT4D research. Information Technology for Development, 25(1), 7-25.

Smith, M. L. (2018). Putting critical realism to use in ICT4D research: Reflections on practice. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 84(6), e12052.

Smith, M., Elder, L & Emdon, H. (2011). Open Development: A new theory for ICT4D. Information Technologies and International Development,7(1), 3-10

Smith, M. L., & Seward, R. K. (2020). Updating Open Development: Open practices in inclusive development. Making Open Development Inclusive: Lessons from IDRC Research, 2.

Smith, M. and Reilly, K. (2013). Open Development: Networked innovations in international development. doi: 10.1596/1020-797X_13_2_14.

Smith, R. and Turpin, M. (2017). Design science research and activity theory in ICT4D: Developing a socially relevant ICT platform for elderly women in remote rural South Africa. In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Springer New York LLC, pp. 345–356. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-59111-7_29.

Stratton, C. and Nemer, D. (2020). ICTD Research in Latin America: Literature review, scholar feedback, and recommendations. Information Technology for Development, 26(4), 692–710. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2019.1701970.

Thomas, M. A., & Li, Y. (2015).A citizen-centric framework for ICTE capacity development in Haiti. Paper Presented at the13th International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries, Negombo, Sri Lanka,May 20–22

Thomas, M. A., Li, Y., & Oliveira, T. (2017). Nuances of development contexts for ICT4D research in least developed countries: An empirical investigation in Haiti. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1093-1112.

Thomas, M. A., Li, Y., Sistenich, V., Diango, K. N., & Kabongo, D. (2022). A multi‐stakeholder engagement framework for knowledge management in ICT4D. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. other detail?

Toyama, K. (2015). Geek heresy: Rescuing social change from the cult of technology. New York: Public Affairs.

Walton, M. and Heeks, R. (2011). Development Informatics Improve ICT4D Project, Case Analysis. other detail?

Worldometer (2023). Government & Economics. Available at: https://www.worldometers.info/ [Accessed 18 December 2023].

Rethinking Sustainability in ICT4D Initiatives through Implementation Outcomes