La validez de la declaración científica en la investigación social experimental

Autores/as

  • Safwan Al Salaimeh Aqaba University of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51247/st.v8iS2.640

Palabras clave:

fiabilidad, probabilidad, paradigma, conocimiento

Resumen

Este trabajo analizó la validez de las afirmaciones científicas en la investigación social experimental, con el objetivo de iniciar un debate sobre el enfoque poliparadigma y las condiciones para su viabilidad. La metodología adoptada fue de naturaleza teórica, y sostuvo que, para obtener un conocimiento razonable, correcto y preciso, fue fundamental adherirse a las reglas heurísticas de un único formato de investigación. Dicha adhesión también facilitó la eliminación de errores sistemáticos y aleatorios, algo que se consideró crucial para la calidad de la investigación.El estudio concluyó que la fiabilidad de las conclusiones estuvo directamente ligada a la adhesión a un paradigma coherente, distinguiendo la fiabilidad del concepto de probabilidad. Sin embargo, se demostró que la probabilidad pudo acercarse a la certeza a medida que el conocimiento se volvió más preciso. Los resultados del estudio apoyaron la teoría pragmatista de la verdad. Finalmente, se concluyó que la repetición y la consistencia de los resultados obtenidos por diferentes investigadores con la misma estrategia fueron los criterios clave para aumentar la fiabilidad del conocimiento.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Akyld,M & Argan. M (2010) using online social networking: student purposes of Facebook usage at the University of Turkey. Journal of Technology Research.

Al Salaimeh, S., Albesuol, K., & Batiha, K. (2011). Combined method of routing multimedia data in computer networks. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 2(5).

Allan, K. (2012). Contemporary social and sociological theory: Visualizing social worlds. Sage publications.

Antoshkin, VN, Lukyanova, RA, Faizullin, IF, Abdrakhmanova, FR, & Bilalova, LM (2017). Sociological research as a method of social diagnoses. Eurasian journal of analytical chemistry, 12(7b), 1.

Aromataris, E., & Riitano, D. (2014). Constructing a search strategy and searching for evidence. Am J Nurs, 114(5), 49-56.

Aromataris, E., & Riitano, D. (2014). Systematic reviews: constructing a search strategy and searching for evidence. AJN The American Journal of Nursing, 114(5), 49-56.

Available social Networking Demographic hanges-2007 vs. 2010. (S/F). http://www.marketing hub.info/social-networking-demographics

Back, L. (2012). Live sociology: Social research and its futures. The Sociological Review, 60, 18-39.

Banerjee, A., Chitnis, U.B., Jadhav, S.L., Bhawalkar, J.S., & Chaudhury, S. (2009). Hypothesis testing, type I and type II errors. Industrial psychiatry journal, 18(2), 127-131.

Baumgarten, M. (2012). Paradigm wars-validity and reliability in qualitative research. GRIN Verlag.

Bernal, J.D. (2012). Science in history: Volume 1: The emergence of science (Vol. 1). Faber & Faber.

Blackburn, S. (1985). Knowledge, truth, and reliability. Oxford University Press.

Boynton, J., Glanville, J., McDaid, D., & Lefebvre, C. (1998). Identifying systematic reviews in MEDLINE: developing an objective approach to search strategy design. Journal of information science, 24(3), 137-154.

Brüssow, H. (2022). What is truth–in science and beyond. Environmental Microbiology, 24(7), 2895-2906.

Burke, P. (2012). A social history of knowledge II: From the Encyclopaedia to Wikipedia. Polity.

Cohen, E.H., Ifergan, M., & Cohen, E. (2002). A new paradigm in guiding: The Madrich as a role model. Annals of tourism research, 29(4), 919-932.

Coulondre, S., & Libourel, T. (2002, September). Towards a new role paradigm for object-oriented modeling. In International Conference on Object-Oriented Information Systems (pp. 44-52). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Daniel, L.G., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2000). Towards an Extended Typology of Research Errors.

David, M. (2004). Theories of truth. In Handbook of epistemology (pp. 331-414). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

de Chiusole, D., Granziol, U., Spoto, A., & Stefanutti, L. (2024). Reliability of a probabilistic knowledge structure. Behavior Research Methods, 56(7), 8022-8037.

Dunkin, M.J. (1996). Types of errors in synthesizing research in education. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 87-97.

Espinoza Freire, EE (2020). Searching for scientific information in academic databases. Metropolitan Journal of Applied Sciences, 3(1), 31-35.

Espinoza Freire, EE (2020). Qualitative research: an ethical tool in the pedagogical field. Conrado, 16(75), 103-110.

Espinoza-Freire, EE (2022). Ethics in scientific research. Mexican Journal of Educational Research and Intervention, 1(2), 35-43.

Haack, S. (1976). The pragmatist theory of truth. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 27(3), 231-249.

Harre, R. (2013). The constructive role of models. In The use of models in the social sciences (pp. 16-43). Routledge.

Heaney, R. P. (2003). Is the paradigm shifting? Bone, 33(4), 457-465.

Hedgecoe, A. (2008). Research ethics review and the sociological research relationship. Sociology, 42(5), 873-886.

Ho, GJ, Liew, SM, Ng, CJ, Hisham Shunmugam, R., & Glasziou, P. (2016). Development of a search strategy for an evidence based retrieval service. PloS one, 11(12), e0167170.

Hogg, M.A., & Ridgeway, C.L. (2003). Social identity: Sociological and social psychological perspectives. Social Psychology Quarterly, 97-100.

James W. (1975). The Meaning of Truth / W. James. - H.: Harward University Press, 1975.-- 328 p.

Janowitz, M. (1975). Sociological theory and social control. American Journal of sociology, 81(1), 82-108.

Kopnin PV (1965). The transition from probable knowledge to reliable / PV Kopnin // Logic of scientific research. - M.: Nauka, 1965.-- S. 177-197.

Kopnin PV (1974). Introduction to Marxist epistemology / PV Kopnin // Gnoseological and logical foundations of science. - M.: Mysl, 1974.-- S. 9-280.

Kornai, J. (2000). The system paradigm. Paradigms of social change: Modernization, development, transformation, evolution, 111-33.

Kun T. (1977). Structure of scientific revolutions / T. Kuhn; per. from English. OF. Naletova. - M.: Progress, 1977.-- 300 p.

Lakatos I. (2008). Falsification and methodology of research programs / I. Lakatos; per. from English. VN Porusa // Selected works on philosophy and methodology of science. - M.: Academic project; Tricksta, 2008.-- S. 281-463.

Luhman N. (2000). Incredibility of communication / N. Luhman; per. with him. AM Lozhenitsyn, ed. NA Golovina // Problems of theoretical sociology. - 2000. - No. 3. - S. 43-54.

McClellan iii, J.E., & Dorn, H. (2015). Science and technology in world history: An introduction. JHU Press.

Newton, R. G. (1997). The truth of science: Physical theories and reality. Harvard University Press.

Neyman, J. (1977). Frequentist probability and frequentist statistics. Synthese, 36(1), 97-131.

Pollard, P., & Richardson, J. T. (1987). On the probability of making Type I errors. Psychological bulletin, 102(1), 159.

Riggs, C.A., Cornes, K., Godwin, H.J., Liversedge, S.P., Guest, R., & Donnelly, N. (2017). The importance of search strategy for finding targets in open terrain. Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2(1), 14.

Riggs, W. D. (2002). Reliability and the Value of Knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 64(1), 79-96.

Rohall, D.E., Milkie, M.A., & Lucas, J.W. (2024). Social psychology: Sociological perspectives. Waveland Press.

Schum, D. A. (1989). Knowledge, probability, and credibility. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2(1), 39-62.

Shapin, S. (1982). History of science and its sociological reconstructions. History of science, 20(3), 157-211.

Tang, W. H. (2018). Knowledge and probability. Knowledge in contemporary philosophy, 195-214.

White, M.D., & Iivonen, M. (2001). Questions as a factor in Web search strategy. Information Processing & Management, 37(5), 721-740.

Zilsel, P., & Zilsel, E. (2003). The social origins of modern science (Vol. 200). Springer Science & Business Media.

Descargas

Publicado

2025-09-01

Cómo citar

Al Salaimeh, S. (2025). La validez de la declaración científica en la investigación social experimental. Sociedad & Tecnología, 8(S2), 414–424. https://doi.org/10.51247/st.v8iS2.640