The impact of information and communication technologies on secondary learning: a systematic review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51247/st.v8iS1.598

Keywords:

TIC, aprendizaje secundario, impacto educativo

Abstract

This systematic review article aimed to analyze the scientific literature on the impact of ICTs on secondary school students' learning. The methodology employed consisted of an exhaustive search of academic databases, followed by the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria to select relevant empirical studies. The results of the review revealed that ICTs have a multifaceted impact on secondary learning, positively influencing motivation, engagement, and the development of digital skills. However, their effect on academic performance is complex and significantly depends on the pedagogical strategy and the type of technology used. In conclusion, the effective integration of ICTs in secondary education requires a thoughtful approach that prioritizes pedagogy and considers the various factors that modulate their impact to optimize learning outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Wade, C. A., Schmid, R. F., Borokhovski, E., Tamim, R. M., ... & Peretiatko, R. (2011). What a difference? A meta-analysis of the impact of ground-based and distance learning in postsecondary education. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 118-127.

Ally, M. (2008). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. In Theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed., pp. 15-44). AU Press.

Anderson, J., & Green, B. (2022). Project-based learning with digital tools: Enhancing critical thinking. Journal of Educational Innovation, 15(2), 45-62.

Area Moreira, M. (2009). Manual digital de la sociedad de la información y la educación. Síntesis.

Bell, S., & Reed, K. (2022). Technology-mediated feedback and the development of critical thinking skills. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(1), 101-118.

Brown, L., Davis, M., & Clark, R. (2023). Online discussions and the cultivation of critical argumentation. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 19(3), 305-320.

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Burgo Bencomo, O. B., León González, J. L., Cáceres Mesa, M. L., Pérez Maya, C. J., & Espinoza Freire, E. E. (2019). Algunas reflexiones sobre investigación e intervención educativa. Revista Cubana de Medicina Militar, 48.

Carr, N. G. (2010). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. W. W. Norton & Company.

Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishing.

Chen, Q., Li, W., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Fostering inferential reasoning through interactive simulations. Science Education, 105(4), 680-700.

Clark, A., & Baker, N. (2021). Structuring online debates to promote critical analysis. Computers & Education, 160, 104035.

Davis, M. (2020). The impact of digital tools on critical thinking: A nuanced perspective. Educational Media International, 57(4), 345-358.

Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1-19). Pergamon.

Downes, S. (2007). Learning networks and connective knowledge. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 3(4), 1.

Espinoza Freire, E. E. (2018). Gestión del conocimiento mediado por tic en la Universidad Técnica de Machala. Fides Et Ratio, 16(16), ág-199.

Espinoza Freire, E. E. (2020a). El problema, el objetivo, la hipótesis y las variables de la investigación. Portal de la Ciencia, 1(2), 1-71.

Espinoza Freire, E. E. (2020b). La búsqueda de información científica en las bases de datos académicas. Revista Metropolitana de Ciencias Aplicadas, 3(1), 31-35.

Espinoza Freire, E. E., & Ricaldi Echevarría, M. L. (2018). El tutor en los entornos virtuales de aprendizaje. Revista Universidad y Sociedad, 10(3), 201-210.

Espinoza Freire, E. E., Martínez, M. J., Jaramillo, J. C., & Encalada, R. P. (2018). La implementación de las TIC en el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje. Revista Metropolitana de Ciencias Aplicadas, 1(3), 10-17.

Evans, P., & Carter, J. (2023). Using digital resources for case analysis in secondary education. The Journal of Educational Research, 116(5), 401-415.

Foster, G. (2021). Authentic assessment with digital portfolios and critical thinking development. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(7), 1080-1095.

García, R., & Lee, S. (2024). Developing information literacy and critical evaluation skills with online curation tools. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 40(1), 23-38.

Granda Asencio, L. Y., Espinoza Freire, E. E., & Mayon Espinoza, S. E. (2019). Las TICs como herramientas didácticas del proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje. Conrado, 15(66), 104-110.

Hall, T., White, K., & Adams, L. (2021). Collaborative digital projects and the growth of critical thinking abilities. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 15(1), Article 6.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

ISTE. (2016). ISTE Standards for Students. International Society for Technology in Education.

Johnson, A., Williams, T., & Smith, B. (2022). Evaluating online source credibility: The role of digital curation tools. Computers & Education, 175, 104330.

Keller, J. M. (1987). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional theories in action: Lessons illustrating selected theories and models (pp. 103-134). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

King, D. (2020). Enhancing problem-based learning with digital simulations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(6), 780-795.

Kirschner, P. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2013). Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 169-183.

Lewis, C. (2024). Supporting inquiry-based learning with digital information analysis tools. Learning and Instruction, 90, 101825.

Ley Leyva, N. V., Morocho Vargas, M. E., & Espinoza Freire, E. E. (2021). La tecnología educativa para enseñanza de la geografía. Conrado, 17(82), 465-472.

Martínez, E. (2019). The digital divide and its implications for technology integration in education. Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3), 201-215.

Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador (2022). Tecnología para la Educación. Link: https://educacion.gob.ec/tecnologia-para-la-educacion/

Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador (2024). Lineamientos generales para el uso de plataformas digitales y otros medios de apoyo educativo como la franja Educa. Link: LineamientosTecnopedagogicosUsoPlataformas.pdf

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.

Moore, K. (2020). Analyzing complex scenarios with collaborative digital platforms. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(7), 1401-1415.

Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura (UNESCO). (2015). Educación 2030: Declaración de Incheon y Marco de Acción para la realización del Objetivo de 1 Desarrollo Sostenible 4.

Pelgrum, W. J., & Law, N. (2003). ICT in education around the world: Trends, problems and prospects. UNESCO Publishing.

Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing.

Phillips, G., & Gray, M. (2020). A systematic review of digital tools for critical thinking development in secondary education. Educational Technology & Society, 23(4), 1-15.

Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.

Roberts, S., & Miller, P. (2023). Using digital platforms to enhance problem-solving skills in mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 70, 101042.

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3-10.

Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. Alfred A. Knopf.

Slavin, R. E. (2008). What educational psychology has to say about evidence-based practice. Educational Psychologist, 43(3), 171-179.

Smith, R., & Jones, C. (2021). Collaborative document creation and its impact on argumentative writing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 700-715.

Taylor, I., & Adams, F. (2020). Developing critical thinking through multimedia creation projects. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 29(1), 67-84.

Trucano, M. (2016). ICTs and education: What do we know about the impact? World Bank Blogs. Recuperado de [https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/education/what-to-do].

Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.

UNESCO. (2011). ICT competency standards for teachers: Policy framework. UNESCO.

van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2020). The digital divide. In The international encyclopedia of media psychology (pp. 1-8). Wiley-Blackwell.

Villacres Arias, G. E., Espinoza Freire, E. E., & Rengifo Ávila, G. K. (2020). Empleo de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación como estrategia innovadora de enseñanza y aprendizaje. Revista Universidad y Sociedad, 12(5), 136-142.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

White, H. (2023). Synthesizing information and presenting arguments with digital storytelling tools. TechTrends, 67(1), 88-97.

Wilson, T. (2022). Improving scientific reasoning with interactive simulations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(2), 250-270.

Young, D. (2022). Facilitating critical discussion in online learning environments. Online Learning, 26(2), 145-160.

Zhao, Y. (2003). What should teachers know about technology? Reflections on the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework. TechTrends, 47(6), 28-31.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-01

How to Cite

The impact of information and communication technologies on secondary learning: a systematic review. (2025). Society & Technology, 8, 292-303. https://doi.org/10.51247/st.v8iS1.598

Similar Articles

1-10 of 286

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)